Tsinghua University(21)
Peking University (21)
Fudan University (71-80)
Shanghai Jiaotong University (71-80)
Zhejiang University (81-90)
Every year, the relentless climb of leading elite institutions from China leads to a chorus, speculating both positively and negatively on the rise of China as a global HE superpower. The logic is fairly straightforward: if trends continue, it won't be long before the rankings are dominated by Chinese institutions.
However, recent information released in China reveals significant differences in projected incomes for the 71 key national universities under the direct jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education.
For 2016, these 71 universities expect receive RMB307.5bn (US$47.31bn or £32.75bn). This equates to an average of RMB4.33bn per institution (US$666m or £461m).
However, the incomes vary significantly. Tsinghua University leads the way with an expected income of RMB18.22bn (US$2.8bn or £1.94bn). At the other end, if we exclude the Central Academy of Drama and the Central Conservatory of Music, the lowest income is that of Shanghai International Studies University (SISU) at a meagre RMB900m (US$138.46m or £95.84m).
To give some figures for comparison at leading universities in the US, UK (all figures from public financial statements released for year to June/July 2015):
Harvard University (ranked no.1 in the recent Times Higher Reputation rankings) reported income in 2015 of US$4.53bn (RMB29.42bn).
The University of Oxford (ranked 5th) reported income of £1.43bn (RMB13.42bn).
If we look at other reputable world ranked universities from the US, UK closer to Tsinghua (18) and PKU (21) rankings:
Cornell (ranked 17th) reported income of US$3.51bn (RMB22.84bn)
UCL (ranked 20th) reported income of £1.18bn (RMB11.06bn)
Full Listing: Projected Income 2016 for 71 Key Universities under MoE Jurisdiction.
Rank
|
University
|
C9
|
985
|
2016
Projected (RMB Bn)
|
1
|
Tsinghua
University
|
Ÿx
|
Ÿx
|
18.217
|
2
|
Zhejiang
University
|
xŸ
|
Ÿx
|
15.428
|
3
|
Peking
University
|
xŸ
|
xŸ
|
15.311
|
4
|
Shanghai
Jiaotong University
|
Ÿx
|
xŸ
|
11.803
|
5
|
Fudan
University
|
Ÿx
|
xŸ
|
7.88
|
6
|
Wuhan
University
|
Ÿx
|
7.823
|
|
7
|
Shandong
University
|
Ÿx
|
7.728
|
|
8
|
Sun
Yat-sen University
|
Ÿx
|
7.396
|
|
9
|
Huazhong
University of Science and Technology
|
Ÿx
|
7.047
|
|
10
|
Tianjin
University
|
Ÿx
|
7.031
|
|
11
|
Sichuan
University
|
Ÿx
|
6.325
|
|
12
|
Tongji
University
|
Ÿx
|
6.007
|
|
13
|
Nanjing
University
|
Ÿx
|
xŸ
|
5.702
|
14
|
Xi'an
Jiaotong University
|
Ÿx
|
xŸ
|
5.637
|
15
|
Xiamen
University
|
Ÿx
|
5.579
|
|
16
|
Beijing
Normal University
|
Ÿx
|
5.367
|
|
17
|
Jilin
University
|
Ÿx
|
5.219
|
|
18
|
Nankai
University
|
Ÿx
|
5.181
|
|
19
|
South
China University of Technology
|
Ÿx
|
5.179
|
|
20
|
Southeast
University
|
Ÿx
|
5.12
|
|
21
|
Central
South University
|
Ÿx
|
5.012
|
|
22
|
Dalian
University of Technology
|
Ÿx
|
4.502
|
|
23
|
Renmin
University
|
Ÿx
|
4.355
|
|
24
|
East
China Normal University
|
Ÿx
|
4.235
|
|
25
|
Wuhan
University of Technology
|
4.151
|
||
26
|
Northeast
University
|
Ÿx
|
4.054
|
|
27
|
Chongqing
University
|
Ÿx
|
3.96
|
|
28
|
University
of Electronic Science and Technology
|
xŸ
|
3.771
|
|
29
|
Beijing
Jiaotong University
|
3.707
|
||
30
|
China
University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
|
3.462
|
||
31
|
China
University of Mining and Technology (Huadong)
|
3.346
|
||
32
|
China
University of Petroleum (East China)
|
3.311
|
||
33
|
Beijing
University of Technology
|
xŸ
|
3.3
|
|
34
|
China
University of Petroleum (Beijing)
|
3.267
|
||
35
|
Lanzhou
University
|
Ÿx
|
3.243
|
|
36
|
Southwest
University
|
3.239
|
||
37
|
Hunan
University
|
Ÿx
|
3.203
|
|
38
|
Southwest
Jiaotong University
|
3.064
|
||
39
|
Beijing
University of Chemical Technology
|
3.007
|
||
40
|
Northwest
Agricultural and Forestry University
|
Ÿx
|
2.973
|
|
41
|
Hehai
University
|
2.888
|
||
42
|
Xidian
University
|
2.828
|
||
43
|
Nanjing
Agricultural University
|
2.746
|
||
44
|
Central
China Agricultural University
|
2.705
|
||
45
|
North
China Electric Power University
|
2.7
|
||
46
|
Hefei
University of Technology
|
2.663
|
||
47
|
Chang'an
University
|
2.653
|
||
48
|
China
Ocean University
|
2.474
|
||
49
|
Central
China Normal University
|
2.445
|
||
50
|
Jiangnan
University
|
2.322
|
||
51
|
Beijing
University of Post and Telecoms
|
2.255
|
||
52
|
Northeast
Normal University
|
2.236
|
||
53
|
China
University of Geosciences (Beijing)
|
2.085
|
||
54
|
Zhongnan
Universiy of Economics and Law
|
2.016
|
||
55
|
Donghua
University
|
19.58
|
||
56
|
Shaanxi
Normal University
|
1.741
|
||
57
|
University
of International Business and Economics
|
1.607
|
||
58
|
Beijing
Forestry University
|
1.567
|
||
59
|
Northeast
Forestry University
|
1.484
|
||
60
|
Beijing
University of Chinese Medicine
|
1.452
|
||
61
|
China
Pharmaceutical University
|
1.412
|
||
62
|
Shanghai
University of Finance and Economics
|
1.316
|
||
63
|
China
University of Mining and Technology (Beijing)
|
1.231
|
||
64
|
Communication
University of China
|
1.192
|
||
65
|
Central
University of Finance and Economics
|
1.136
|
||
66
|
Beijing
Foreign Studies University
|
1.018
|
||
67
|
Beijing
Language and Culture University
|
1.015
|
||
68
|
China
University of Politics and Law
|
0.991
|
||
69
|
Shanghai
International Studies University
|
0.902
|
||
70
|
Central
Conservatory of Music
|
0.42
|
||
71
|
Central
Academy of Drama
|
0.305
|
||
TOTAL FUNDING for MoE 71
Institutions
|
307.527
|
In all cases, expenditure at the US/UK universities listed above accounts for at least 95% of income in 2015. Figures (not published here) show similar income/expenditure patterns for all Chinese universities in 2015, so it is expected that these universities will spend the overwhelming majority (95%+) of these project 2016 incomes.
C9, 985 and 211
Chinese universities which emphasise science and technology demonstrate much greater projected incomes than those, such as SISU Beijing Foreign Studies University and others with an emphasis on humanities, liberal arts and social sciences.
These 71 universities are all members of Project 211, while there are 31 universities also categorised under Project 985 (the remaining 8 members of Project 985 are under the jurisdiction of other Ministries). Similarly, there are 7 of the 9 members of the elite C9 Group.
However, the C9 universities take the top 5, with Nanjing (13th) and Xi'an Jiaotong (14th) pushed further down the rankings by several other big hitters from the 985 group. Perhaps even more surprisingly, only one of these (Tongji) is from the education powerhouse of Shanghai, with none from Beijing. Universities from Hebei, Shandong, Guangdong, Tianjin and Sichuan occupy positions 6th-11th, with Tongji in 12th spot.
Further down the table, we also see some of the Project 211 universities (or more correctly non-985 universities) shaking things up. Wuhan University of Technology places 26th in terms of income, knocking several 985 universities down. Other prominent non 985 universities include Beijing Jiaotong University; China University of Geosciences (Wuhan, Hubei); China University of Mining and Technology (Xuzhou, Jiangsu) and China University of Petroleum (Qingdao, Shandong and Beijing Campuses).
Wuhan appears to be emerging as an inland educational powerhouse after Beijing and Shanghai, and is undoubtedly the most prominent city in terms of development and growth. In addition to the several universities listed here, Wuhan has a strong provincial education infrastructure with strengths in several important areas, all concentrated in area where Wuchang district borders with Hongshan district in southeastern Wuhan. Certainly, this table shows that Wuhan's prominent universities are punching above their weight.
Of course, simple comparisons of income levels don't really tell us that much, without taking into account other factors (location is important for attracting students; province with regards to difficulty of entry; region in terms of how far that income goes). So we can certainly see that Fudan is falling behind the leading 4 in terms of income, but considering the expense of being located in Shanghai, would have to argue does better with its income that Wuhan, Shandong, Sun Yat'sen, Huazhong Keji and Tianjin (6th - 10th, within RMB7-8bn budget). That beings said, Fudan is more attractive to talented academics precisely because it is in Shanghai.
It remains to be seen whether the trend of Chinese universities rocketing up the world rankings of THE, QS and Jiaotong's ARWU can be maintained. Given the disparity between Key National Universities (71 listed here, but China has over 2200 HEI's with well over 1000 delivering HE at the 4yr degree level and above), I expect that while Tsinghua, PKU will become the leading lights, and SJTU, Zhejiang and Fudan will also gain global recognition, its going to be sometime before the likes of Nankai, Shandong, Tianjin, Wuhan and Huakeda become well known beyond China's borders and especially as global brands outside the academic sphere.
No comments:
Post a Comment